The recent move by Argentina's new president, Milei, to reduce the number of ministers from 18 to 9, this has sparked discussions on the size of governments and their efficiency. Comparing Argentina, with a population of about 45 million, to Ghana, with a population of 35 million, and a GDP of $632.77 billion and $187 billion respectively, sheds light on the importance of streamlining government structures. This article argues why Ghana, in particular, needs fewer ministers for effective governance.
Argentina's decision to halve the number of ministries is rooted in the pursuit of economic efficiency. A leaner government often translates to reduced bureaucratic hurdles, faster decision-making processes, and ultimately, a more efficient allocation of resources. In contrast, Ghana's failure to address the issue leaves the country susceptible to potential economic strain and mismanagement.
Reducing the number of ministers is not just a matter of economic efficiency; it is also about fiscal responsibility. Milei's pledge to cut social spending in Argentina aligns with the recognition that a streamlined government is better equipped to manage finances judiciously. In Ghana, the call for fewer ministers resonates with concerns about the burden on the public purse, especially when resources could be directed to essential sectors like education.
The argument against an expansive government structure in Ghana emphasizes that it becomes a drain on the economy. With officials receiving numerous benefits, often labeled as "freebies," the financial burden on the state increases. This, coupled with a growing number of ministers, detracts resources that could otherwise be used to address pressing issues, such as the plight of students still attending schools under trees.
A key contention is that, apart from regional ministers, the number of central government ministers should not exceed constitutional limits. This distinction highlights the need for a balanced and purposeful distribution of ministerial roles. The suggestion by Mr. Desmond John Beddy, the author of "The History of Ghanaians in Germany" to limit ministers to 15 emphasizes the belief that an increase in ministers deprives other sectors of the economy, contributing to societal challenges like poor infrastructure.
The worst part of the Ghanaian society, as observed, is that the manipulated are often those who defend poor governance. With a government structure perceived as inefficient and contributing to the concentration of benefits among a few elites, the majority of Ghanaians find themselves wallowing in poverty, facing issues like bad roads and children learning under trees.
Argentina's recent governmental restructuring serves as a valuable lesson for Ghana. The urgency for fewer ministers is not merely an administrative matter; it is a crucial step towards economic efficiency, fiscal responsibility, and addressing the needs of the majority. As Ghana grapples with these challenges, the call for a leaner government echoes not only economic principles but also the collective voice of those seeking a more equitable and prosperous future for the nation.
Desmond John Beddy
https://beddy.de
The Urgent Need for Fewer Ministers in Ghana's Government: Learning from Argentina's
